Skip to Main Content

Political Science

A guide to library resources for Political Science research.

SURF or Databases?

SURF does a good job at checking a lot of places the library has access to, essentially trying super hard to complete your search across not only all of the library's physical and digital holdings but also across as many of our database and journal subscriptions as possible - but it's just not able to check absolutely everywhere every time. 

Remember, it's your job to determine where and how to search for the best results that meet your information need! It's a good practice to cast the widest net in your research by looking in different places for your sources and digging deeper than just a simple search in SURF. As the place where information or the source itself is kept, databases can connect you with sources directly and allow for much more customized and deeper research practices as you continue.

For example, one way to incorporate it would be to try out different keywords and result limiters with SURF before moving the search into a larger, interdisciplinary database, like Academic Search Ultimate, or even a more focused subject database, like Business Source Complete, where you can see how different levels of technical language can effect your searches.

Use SURF to Find Articles

Suggested Databases

Evaluating Sources

There is a general timeline for how long it might take information to be published in a particular form after an event happens.

An Event Happens:

  1. The day of you may find information in television, radio, and internet.
  2. The day after you'll get newspaper articles.
  3. A week after you'll get popular magazine articles.
  4. Months after you'll get scholarly articles.
  5. A year after will find books and government publications published.
  6. Years after the event might show up in reference books.

Differences between scholarly and popular sources

Author

Scholarly
Can always tell who wrote it; the author is an expert in the field with available credentials.
Popular
Name or credentials may not be provided; has little to no expertise on the subject.

Audience

Scholarly
Written in jargon for other professionals in the field to understand.
Popular
Written in non-technical language anyone can understand.

Editor

Scholarly
Reviewed by a board of experts (peer review).
Popular
Reviewed not by experts in the field but by a staff editor.

Citations

Scholarly
Sources are referenced with in-text citations and a bibliography.
Popular
References to outside sources are rare and do not include a bilbiography.

Length

Scholarly
Longer articles with in-depth analysis, generally at least five pages long
Popular
Shorter articles with a broader topic focus.

Format

Scholarly
Clear sections like an abstract, literature review, methodology, results, conclusion, and bibliography. May include illustrations that directly support the text like a table or graph.
Popular
Does not follow any particular structure. Images may be glossy color photographs or include advertisements.

The CRAAP Test for evaluating materials. This is adapted from "Applying the CRAAP Test" by the Meriam Library at California State University, Chico.

Currency

  • When was the information published or posted?
  • Has the information been revised or updated?
  • Does your topic require current information or will older sources work as well?
  • Are the links functional?

Relevancy

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?
  • Who is the intended audience?
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or too advanced for your needs)?
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use?
  • Would you be comfortable citing this source in your research paper?

Authority

  • Who is the author, publisher, source, and/or sponsor?
  • What are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations?
  • Is the author qualified to write on this topic?
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or email address?
  • Are the links functional?

Accuracy

  • Where does the information come from?
  • Is the information supported by evidence?
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?
  • Does the language or tone seem unbiased and free of emotion?
  • Are there spelling, grammar, or typographical errors?

Purpose

  • What is the purpose of the information? Is it to inform, teach, sell, entertain, or persuade?
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?
  • Is the information fact, opinion, or propaganda?
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?

Consider the Source 

Click away from the story to investigate the site, its mission and its contact info.

Read Beyond 

Headlines can be outrageous in an effort to get clicks. What's the whole story?

Check the Author 

Do a quick search on the author. Are they credible? Are they real?

Supporting Sources? 

Click on those links. Determine if the info given actually supports the story. 

Check the Date 

Reposting old news stories doesn't mean they're relevant to current events.

Is it a Joke? 

If it is too outlandish, it might be satire. Research the site and author to be sure. 

Check your Biases 

Consider if your own beliefs could affect your judgment. 

Ask the Experts 

Ask a librarian or consult a fact-checking site. 

 

 

This information is from IFLA or the The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions