Skip to Main Content

COMM 101 Research Guide: Strategic Reading

Strategic reading

Strategic reading involves using techniques to quickly understand source content. 

Strategic reading of a scholarly journal article involves focusing on key sections.


Title & Abstract

Introduction

Literature review

Method

Results

Discussion/Conclusion

Title

The title is usually what grabs your attention first. If it looks relevant, move on to the Abstract, located below the title in the article.

The Abstract is a very brief summary of the article. Huge time-saver.

Read it in a few seconds to find:

  • The need or problem that warrants examination.
  • Who/what was studied and how (method).
  • Findings of the study -what the authors learned.

Introduction

The Introduction describes the author's claim. The claim here is that research has been done on other areas of this topic, but this article examines something new. 

Literature review

In the Literature Review, the authors describe past work of other researchers on this topic.

Lists lots of author names and years of publications. Usually located after the Introduction. 

Method

The method section of a scholarly journal article outlines the research design, procedures, and techniques used to collect and analyze data, ensuring the study can be replicated.

It typically includes details on participants, materials, and the step-by-step process followed during the research.

Results - Reading Diagram says to start here

In the Results (or "Findings") section of a scholarly article, the authors present the core findings of their research without interpretation. This part of the paper tells the story of what the activity in the Method section revealed.

Key patterns, trends, and statistically significant results are highlighted, often supported by tables, figures, or charts.

Discussion

The discussion section serves as the interpretive heart of a scholarly article.

Here, the authors move beyond the raw data to explore what the results mean in the broader context of the field. Authors often compare their results with previous studies, highlighting consistencies or discrepancies and offering possible explanations. They may also discuss the implications of their findings for theory, practice, or future research.

  • Interprets the results, explaining their significance of what they found in this study.
  • It also often suggests directions for future research.